'Deathly Hallows - Part 2' to be the Shortest 'Harry Potter' Film. I'm so sad...


I am so sad since I got this news. This is serious. This is not part of April Fool thing.

Steven Weintraub, one of the guys behind the website Collider attended the CinemaCon 2011 in Las Vegas (which as happened just few hours ago) and being a lucky man.... he saw some exclusive footages of the upcoming films 'Green Latern' and 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 2' and more.

And he also got the chance to interview the two Davids of 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 2': David Heyman (the cute one) and David Barron (he misses his hair). On the said interview, the two Davids said that the final 'Harry Potter' will be in 3D, full of actions.... and (so sad) this film is going to be the shortest 'Harry Potter' film.

Here is the video of the interview. Thanks to Steven Weintraub

Here is the transcript, again done by Steven Weintraub. Thank you so much!!!

Collider: How did you guys decide what footage you wanted to show the theater owners today?

Heyman: Well part of it was what was ready, quite frankly. Because we’re still very much editing and also still very much doing the visual effects. So a lot of the visual effects being shown here will be very rough, and the footage is still rough. But we just showed some exciting bits and some really good dramatic scenes.

Barron: What the movie’s about.

Heyman: To let people in, a little bit.

When you guys first presented Harry Potter, I believe it was last year but maybe 2 years ago, but you guys actually showed a scene from Harry facing Voldemort for the final time. And it was in the very beginning of the footage you showed, and for me, I gasped, because I couldn’t believe you were showing this.

Barron: (laughs) Just teasing.

Heyman: You had to wait a little while before you actually saw it in the film.

Are you showing anymore of that scene today?

Heyman: No

Barron: There’s one shot of each, I think.

Heyman: Yeah there’s a couple of shots, but we’re not showing cut footage.

You guys decided not to do the 3D conversion for Part 1, but you said 3D for Part 2. Is Part 2 still being released in 3D?

Heyman: Yes it is. The reason we didn’t do it on the first part was because we didn’t feel that we could do it justice. And actually the 3D would actually compromise the film, so we didn’t have the time.

Barron: We were diving into 3D for the first time, it was a new world for us, and so we didn’t get off to a fine start. There wasn’t time to do it properly, and so Warners very very kindly supported us. I’m sure they were wishing it was not the case, but they were hugely supportive to not put out something that we weren’t happy with.

You mentioned that you guys were eventually gonna release Part 1 in 3D whether it be on Blu-ray or a re-release theatrically.

Heyman: We’re doing Blu-ray.

Barron: It’s going really well.

Heyman: We’re in the process of doing it right now and we’re really excited about the quality, we feel it adds something to the film and is really immersive as opposed to taking out, which I think a lot of 3D can do. And it’s been great for us going through that process to lead into the theatrical because I think we’ve learned an awful lot.

Barron: We have learned a lot.

Heyman: David Yates is approaching 3D from a character point of view.

Barron: It’s a storytelling aid. Rather than being a special effect gimmick where it’s like “Oh that’s cool.” We’re using it to help tell the story better.

Heyman: It’s probably gonna be more subtle than on some films, we’re not gonna have tons of stuff flying out the screen, we’ll have some but not much. The depth will not necessarily be as great as some films. But it will make the film feel larger, be more immersive, and I think it will add to the stories as opposed to take away.

Do you guys ever envision a 3D conversion of the earlier films and also the theatrical re-release of them in 3D?

Heyman: We haven’t’ talked about it but I won’t be surprised if that happens. I don’t know about theatrical but I suspect in 3D that will go on.

What’s the running time of the final film?

Barron: It will be one of the shortest films.

Heyman: It will be the shortest film.

So what does that mean?

Heyman: We don’t know yet, because we’re still editing.

Barron: It’s not a short film, but it will be shorter than the others.

When I spoke to you guys last time, you mentioned that the last film was much more of an action film. Is that still the case?

Heyman: It’s not non-stop action, but it’s a lot of action. But, one the the things that makes Harry Potter so special is it’s not just action, not just magic, it’s characters, humanity and truth.

Barron: And a strong emotional core.

Heyman: And that’s what this film has: a real strong emotional center. So yeah there’s a lot of action, and it’s a really thrilling ride, and it ends with the final confrontation with Voldemort with Harry, but most importantly it’s a film that moves you and it makes you really involved and invested in the characters.

It means, Order of the Phoenix' is not the shortest 'Harry Potter' film any more.

Source: Collider

Photo: Collider and Warner Bros. Pictures


Leave a comment

Related Posts with Thumbnails